WorkPrinter website update -new products-

[MovieStuff]

Hi, all!

I have updated the WorkPrinter website. I now offer three different versions of the WorkPrinter. I also offer an stand-alone condenser lens. Please see:
http://www.afterimagephoto.tv/workprinter.html

Thanks!

Roger

------------------
Roger Evans
MovieStuff
http://www.afterimagephoto.tv/moviestuff.html

[MovieStuff]

I am considering developing some new items. There seems to an interest in intervelometers as well as the possibility of printing from video back to super 8 or 16mm. These are areas I will try to explore along with the "auto slate" device I described in another topic. If you have any other (serious) suggestions for items of interest that you feel the super 8 community, as a whole, would benefit from, please let me know.

Thanks!

Roger

------------------
Roger Evans
MovieStuff
http://www.afterimagephoto.tv/moviestuff.html

[Matt Pacini]

Yeah, Roger.
We've already gone over some of this stuff privately, but for the sake of those on this forum, I'll restate them here:

1. An intervalometer.
2. A sequencer.
3. A way to shoot off a monitor with a Cine camera.
4. A device to sound-stripe my own prints, so I don't have to do any lab work at all, other than processing my film!!!!! (I thought this may be a stretch, even for you!! Would be cool though.....)
5. A low-cost SMPTE slate! (I think you could really do well with one of these, since they're so damn expensive for no good reason!)


Matt Pacini

------------------

[Vurfer]

I know a guy here in Germany who has a way of setting up computer monitors that they could be used in professional 35mm shoots. I think it involved running them at 96 Hz and syncing the video card to the camera somehow.
Would that be of any interest to you?

[Matt Pacini]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Courier, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Vurfer:
I know a guy here in Germany who has a way of setting up computer monitors that they could be used in professional 35mm shoots. I think it involved running them at 96 Hz and syncing the video card to the camera somehow.
Would that be of any interest to you?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Not really. I would not be filming them in real time.
I would be stepping each frame, one at a time, and filming each frame with a delay of perhaps several seconds between each one.
Matt Pacini


------------------